1. Home
  2. Use cases
  3. Climate fund

Data room for a climate fund raise

A climate fund data room needs the standard fund documents plus the evidence behind the climate thesis: how emissions avoided or reduced are calculated, which technologies and projects the fund backs, its exposure to policy and tax credit changes, and how it reports climate data to LPs.

Fund raises

How this raise works

Climate funds range from venture funds backing early-stage technology to growth equity, infrastructure and project funds that build renewable generation, storage, grid assets and industrial decarbonization. LPs include pensions and insurers with net zero commitments, foundations, sovereign wealth funds, corporates and family offices.

Diligence splits into return drivers and climate claims. On returns, LPs examine technology risk, offtake and pricing, dependence on subsidies or tax credits, construction and supply chain risk, and the team's operating record. On climate claims, they look at emissions methodology (commonly the GHG Protocol for corporate inventories and PCAF for financed emissions), baseline choices and whether avoided emissions are kept separate from actual reductions.

Policy exposure deserves a clear folder. Federal and state incentives for clean energy have changed several times, and a model built on one set of tax credit rules can shift quickly. Show which assets depend on credits, the assumptions used and a sensitivity case without them.

Best data rooms for this raise

The 16 rooms re-ranked with this raise's weights. Investor tracking carries the most weight here.

  • Investor tracking 23%
  • Permission control 19%
  • Raise workflow 22%
  • Investor onboarding 17%
  • Cost of a raise 19%
  1. 1

    Ellty

    Founded 2020, Australia

    8.8Top choice

    Full deal room with AI, a listed price and a 14-day free trial.

    Price $149 a month Trial 14-day free trial Features 8 of 12 listed
  2. 2

    iDeals

    Founded 2008, United Kingdom

    7.9Solid choice

    Long-running M&A platform with layered permissions and fast support.

    Price Priced on request Trial Free trial available Features 9 of 12 listed
  3. 3

    Datasite

    Founded 1999, United States

    7.7Solid choice

    Bank-grade platform for large processes, with AI and a mobile app.

    Price Priced on request Trial Demo on request Features 10 of 12 listed
  4. 4

    Ansarada

    Founded 2005, Australia

    7.5Solid choice

    Deal room with AI and readiness tools for preparing a process.

    Price Priced on request Trial Free trial available Features 8 of 12 listed
  5. 5

    SecureDocs

    Founded 2012, United States

    7.4Solid choice

    Simple flat-rate deal room with signing and Q&A.

    Price $250 a month Trial Free trial available Features 8 of 12 listed
  6. 6

    CapLinked

    Founded 2010, United States

    7.3Worth a look

    Deal room with a listed monthly price and an open API.

    Price $299 a month Trial Free trial available Features 7 of 12 listed
  7. 7

    Box

    Founded 2005, United States

    7.3Worth a look

    Content cloud with watermarks and signing, priced per user.

    Price $15 a user a month Trial Free trial available Features 9 of 12 listed
  8. 8

    Firmex

    Founded 2006, Canada

    7.3Worth a look

    Easy, reliable deal room favored by mid-market advisers.

    Price Priced on request Trial Free trial available Features 7 of 12 listed
  9. 10

    Drooms

    Founded 2001, Germany

    7.1Worth a look

    European deal room strong in real estate, with AI features.

    Price Priced on request Trial Demo on request Features 8 of 12 listed

Places 11 to 16: DealRoom (7.0), SmartRoom (6.9), ShareVault (6.7), Digify (6.4), Venue by DFIN (6.2), DocSend (6.2)

Folder index for the room

A starting index for this raise. Number the folders so the order survives exports and investors can cite them in questions.

  1. 01 Fund overviewStrategy, sectors and stages, return target, target size and closes.
  2. 02 Offering documentsPPM, LPA draft, subscription booklet.
  3. 03 Track recordDeal and project-level returns, gross and net.
  4. 04 Climate thesisDecarbonization pathways targeted and how deals are screened.
  5. 05 Emissions methodologyFrameworks used, baselines, avoided versus reduced emissions, verification.
  6. 06 Policy and incentivesAssets relying on tax credits or subsidies, assumptions, sensitivity without them.
  7. 07 Technology and project riskTechnical diligence approach, independent engineer reports, supply chain review.
  8. 08 TeamInvestment, technical and operating bios.
  9. 09 DDQ and ODDDDQ, ESG questionnaire, valuation policy, service providers.
  10. 10 LP foldersPer-LP side letters and climate reporting requests.

Features this raise needs

FeatureWhyElltyiDealsDatasiteAnsaradaSecureDocsCapLinked
Investor activity logA per-investor record of opens, pages and minutes, which tells the IR team who is in diligence and who stalled.
Q&A moduleLPs and lead investors post questions on a file; the deal team routes each one, drafts a reply and decides who sees it.
Drag-and-drop foldersAn entire numbered folder tree goes up in a single drop, structure intact.
Dynamic watermarksStamps the reader and a timestamp over every page, so a PPM that leaks carries its source with it.

Setting up the room

  1. 01

    Separate avoided and reduced emissions

    Report them in different columns with the method for each. LPs with net zero targets count them differently.

  2. 02

    Stress test policy assumptions

    Model returns without tax credits or with reduced ones, and put the result next to the base case.

  3. 03

    Share technical reports with care

    Independent engineer and technology reports go view-only to LPs in diligence.

  4. 04

    Prepare LP climate reporting

    Show a sample of the climate data you will report each year, in the format LPs use for their own disclosures.

  5. 05

    Keep claims tied to sources

    Every emissions figure in the deck links to a dated calculation in the methodology folder.

Common mistakes

  • Adding avoided emissions to actual reductions in a single headline number.
  • A return case that only works under tax credit rules that have since changed.
  • No independent technical review for first-of-a-kind technology.
  • Climate claims in marketing that the methodology folder cannot support.

Questions and answers

What makes a climate fund data room different?

It adds an emissions methodology, policy and incentive exposure, and technical risk evidence to the usual fund documents, track record and DDQ.

Which emissions frameworks do LPs expect?

Many LPs expect the GHG Protocol for corporate emissions and PCAF for financed emissions, with avoided emissions reported separately and the method stated.

How should a climate fund show tax credit risk?

List the assets that rely on credits, state the assumptions and show a downside case. Rules have changed more than once, so date the analysis.

Related raises

Which data room fits your raise?

Four questions. About thirty seconds.

Step 1 of 4What are you raising?